Wikipedia…10 year of power to the people!

Wikipedia, the free Internet encyclopedia, exists exactly ten years.

At the start in January 2001, many people said Wikipedia could stand a chance because with the business model it claimed: everyone had the power to add, write and re-write articles on this online “encyclopedia”.  The simple idea of each individual has the knowledge, and has the power to share it, made a big collective memory….but sceptisist said Wikipedia was filled with rubbish, lies and unreliable information. But now it appears that the massive social control is one of the key-succes factors.  Through what is now known as the “wisdom of the crowd”: the power of the mass is, by definition, smarter (bigger) than the individual.

You can put it to the test, and I dare you! Register (if you’re not already), and make a change to an item on Wikipedia.  It won’t last 24 hours before your false information has been corrected. Share your experiences through the comment section please

Wikipedia in 2011

Most people already have stopped to wonder whether Wikipedia is reliable, and put the site with their favorites. For what else is the alternative? Not the countless Google pages you get whenever you type a search term.
Even in classrooms, and (some) colleges, universities, … Wikipedia slowly gets embraced.  Not as the biggest scientific source, but as a source to get started when you’re on a quest for knowledge. It gives direction, and makes sure that you don’t get caught in the big search-result web (see my post: can google handle the spam-pressure?). Off course for in dept information you need to look elsewhere.
Nature tested the reliability of Wikipedia against the Encyclopedia Britannica  in 2005. Forty of the scientific journal reviewers compared fifty articles from both online encyclopedia’s . They found 123 errors in Britannica an 162 in Wikipedia 162. Both organizations made four serious errors according to Nature. It concluded from this that both encyclopaedias are almost as reliable!

It’s thanks to some 150,000 voluntary moderators that Wikipedia keeps its accuracy.  All over the world independent volunteers keep track off changes made on articles, new posts, new items, … They check everything and make corrections when necessary. (So as they will do with your mistake…did you check back to see if it was re-edidet already?). That total neutrality and independence are very important to the Wikipedians. Founder Jimmy Wales refuses any request from companies for advertising on the site. He fears that the perception about the reliability and independence are at risk.  
That’s why Jimmy Wales still insists on working with voluntary donations. Recently, he has an alms-round and it brought in no time at $ 16,000,000. The money is used for maintainance of servers and to run ‘only’ 35 paid staff  members. 

The bigger Wikipedia (and the Web) get, the more power they will give to the people…but well controlled and maintained by you and me!

Tagged with:
Posted in Flat Business
3 comments on “Wikipedia…10 year of power to the people!
  1. Maria says:

    Happy Birthday Wikipedia!
    “Wiki” has been added to my favorites on the day that I bought my first laptop and has remained there ever since. Since I am a student, I use it as a valuable source research for my papers. My university does not allow quotations from Wikipedia but at least it’s always a good way to start research because it gives a good overview of the subject in question and it allows tracking the information via the given sources. Of course it’s probably a not very reliable source but has someone ever controlled the sources of a hardcopy encyclopedia?
    My parents own a series of encyclopedia that is displayed prominently in their living room but I can’t remember that I have ever just touched them. There are no pictures and I have to search my way through hundreds of pages. No wonder that the younger generation prefers to get their information from Wikipedia instead of their parents’ encyclopedia. I for my part would rather donate some money to Wikipedia instead of investing it into an encyclopedia.

  2. Havva says:

    Wiki – the best friend of a student!

    I will say, that I also (like Maria) very often use Wikipedia. It’s a easy tool to get quickly information about a certain topic – and if you should write a scientific work where you should use “serious” sources – I use Wiki to find these serious sources!

    I guess that a lot of lecturers also use Wiki to get an quick overview about a topic (But they will never tell that!)

  3. Martina says:

    I also really appreciate Wikipedia as a general reference to get an overview about a new topic or issue. The Wikipedia articles are always very clear and explain difficult issues very descriptive. Further in my opinion it is a very updated resource. No doubt there is some criticism on the reliability and accuracy of the information issued on the Wikipedia encyclopedia. That’s why it is not allowed to be used as a source in scientific articles.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 829 other followers

Flat World Poll
  • 398,208 hits
%d bloggers like this: